Wednesday, October 24, 2012

The Place of Religion in Government


       Devon Clunis, Winnipeg's new police chief, recently told a Christian magazine that prayer is a "powerful weapon" that he hopes will lead to positive action and community involvement, and help reduce crime in the city. He also spoke at length about how his faith has helped him personally, and said that no matter what is happening in Winnipeg, God is in control. He told the interviewer,

"This is about the health and the welfare, the well-being of our community. I'm not trying to create converts into any particular faith or religious belief system – that's not what this is about. But because I know this [faith] is such an integral part of so many individuals, why would we not engage that in terms of fighting crime and creating a better city for all our citizens?"

       You can watch the interview by clicking here (it is about 15 minutes long).

       As is to be expected in today's society, many strict secularists have called Mr. Clunis's comments inappropriate, postulating that religion is a private matter with no relevance in public settings and something that should definitely not be mentioned by any prominent government official. Unfortunately, some have even reached the conclusion that Mr. Clunis is unfit to be Winnipeg's police chief, merely because he talked about his personal faith and suggested that prayer is beneficial to society.

       Here is what I think. Canada should have a full separation of religion and state, for three main reasons. Firstly, because religious institutions should not be able to dictate government decisions. Secondly, because the government should not be able to dictate the decisions of religious institutions, nor the spiritual decisions of individuals. Thirdly, because every citizen should be able to contribute to society and a person's religious faith should not determine whether or not he or she can hold a position in government.
       That being said, Canada's constitution also guarantees religious freedom and freedom of speech, two basic human rights that are necessary for a country to be free and democratic. Without the freedom to make spiritual decisions for yourself and develop an individual worldview apart from government interference, and without the freedom to express those spiritual beliefs and act according to your own worldview, a nation cannot be a free and democratic country. Because these freedoms are so vital to Canadian society, our government should not proscribe or even discourage its citizens from expressing their religious beliefs (with the exception of hate speech that directly encourages the use of violence against any group or individual, which is incontrovertibly wrong and detrimental to society). Without this freedom to express spiritual beliefs and act upon them, freedom of religion is paralyzed and useless.  Even the citizens of the dystopia depicted in George Orwell's novel 1984 could think as they wished. However, Big Brother forbid his citizens to act out on their beliefs or express them openly, killing the usefulness of their free will.
       I believe wholeheartedly that these freedoms must correlate directly into government as well. Civil servants of all shapes and sizes must be able to determine their own beliefs, act upon those beliefs, and express those beliefs openly, even while on the job. The principle that government officials must "leave their religion at the door" as they begin their job and refuse to discuss matters pertaining to their core beliefs is not only anti-democratic, dangerous, and in violation of human rights, but also next to impossible. You cannot cut a person's mind in half to completely separate their beliefs pertaining to God and their other beliefs (such as those pertaining to politics, government, other people, and their job). A person's core beliefs will influence their job, whether they believe in Christianity, Islam, atheism, agnosticism, or any other worldview. This is especially evident with Mr. Clunis, who says that his Christian faith is foundational to everything he does.
       Furthermore, a democratic government is supposed to represent all of its citizens. For that reason, government departments in Canada try to be racially diverse and include minorities. I see the inclusion of religion as a mere extension of that diversity. Government will never be able to get rid of religion. Our governments should instead embrace religion, realizing that allowing government officials to be religious while on the job is another way of representing their citizens more fully and enabling their officials to serve the public better.

       In conclusion, I think government should be religion-inclusive, not religion-free. Devon Clunis's comments were certainly appropriate, and I will be praying with him for the people of Winnipeg.

Monday, October 8, 2012

Magnificent Orthodoxy



     G.K. Chesterton (1874-1936) is one of Christianity's finest writers, and I would venture to say that he is among the English language's finest writers as well. While I'm at it, I might as well state also that his book Orthodoxy is one of Christianity's finest books, although at this point I should offer my sincere apologies for being so repetitive. Chesterton thought quite outside the box, drawing unexpected connections between things and using delightful metaphors. He was quite adept at finding mots justes, as well as "phrases justes" and "paragraphe justes." His writing always seems to have an undercurrent of irony and subtle humour, which becomes clear and obvious in the occasional sentence, and makes his works even more enjoyable.
     I highly recommend this book to lovers of literature – bookworms, wordsmiths, and wannabe writers alike – as well as to those interested in religion, philosophy, Christianity, and Christian apologetics. Some parts can be difficult to understand, but if you can decipher my incoherent ramblings (and more importantly, appreciate my self-deprecating humour), I trust you have the intelligence to comprehend Chesterton's literary masterpiece.
     Here are some of my favourite quotes from Orthodoxy:


Chapter 1:

I know nothing so contemptible as a mere paradox; a mere ingenious defence of the indefensible.


Chapter 2:

Thoroughly worldly people never understand even the world; they rely altogether on a few cynical maxims which are not true.

Poetry is sane because it floats easily in an infinite sea; reason seeks to cross the infinite sea, and so make it finite. The result is mental exhaustion, like the physical exhaustion of Mr. Holbein. To except everything is an exercise, to understand everything a strain. The poet only desires exaltation and expansion, a world to stretch himself in. The poet only asks to get his head into the heavens. It is the logician who seeks to get the heavens into his head. And it is his head that splits.

Mysticism keeps men sane.


Chapter 3:

The phrases of the street are not only forcible but subtle: for a figure of speech can often get into a crack too small for a definition.

Humility was largely meant as a restraint upon the arrogance and infinity of the appetite of man. He was always outstripping his mercies with his own newly invented needs... But what we suffer from today is humility in the wrong place. Modesty has moved from the organ of ambition. Modesty has settled upon the organ of conviction; where it was never meant to be. A man was meant to be doubtful about himself, but undoubting about the truth; this has been exactly reversed.

That peril is that the human intellect is free to destroy itself. Just as one generation could prevent the very existence of the next generation, by all entering a monastery or jumping into the sea, so one set of thinkers can in some degree prevent further thinking by teaching the next generation that there is no validity in any human thought. It is idle to talk always of the alternative of reason and faith. Reason is itself a matter of faith. It is an act of faith to assert that our thoughts have any relation to reality at all. If you are merely a skeptic, you must sooner or later ask yourself the question, "Why should anything go right; even observation and deduction? Why should not good logic be as misleading as bad logic? They are both movements in the brain of a bewildered ape." The young sceptic says, "I have a right to think for myself." But the old sceptic, the complete sceptic, says, "I have no right to think for myself. I have no right to think at all."

For we can hear skepticism crashing through the old ring of authorities, and at the same moment we can see reason swaying upon her throne. In so far as religion is gone, reason is going. For they are both of the same primary and authoritative kind. They are both methods of proof which cannot themselves be proved. And in the act of destroying the idea of Divine authority we have largely destroyed the idea of that human authority by which we do a long-division sum. With a long and sustained tug we have attempted to pull the mitre off pontifical man; and his head has come off with it.

We have no more questions to ask. We have looked for questions in the darkest corners and on the wildest peaks. We have found all the questions that can be found. It is time we gave up looking for questions and began looking for answers.

Thinking in isolation and with pride ends in being an idiot. Every man who will not have the softening of the heart must at last have the softening of the brain.

Madness may be defined as using mental activity so as to reach mental helplessness.


Chapter 4:

There is the great lesson of "Beauty and the Beast"; that a thing must be loved before it is loveable.

Children are grateful when Santa Claus puts in their stockings gifts of toys or sweets. Could I not be grateful to Santa Claus when he put in my stockings the gift of two miraculous legs? We thank people for birthday presents of cigars and slippers. Can I thank no one for the birthday present of birth?

Strike a glass, and it will not endure an instant; simply do not strike it, and it will endure a thousand years. Such, it seemed, was the joy of man, either in elfland or on earth; the happiness depended on not doing something which you could at any moment do, and which, very often, it was not obvious why you should not do.


Chapter 5:

For decoration is not given to hide horrible things: but the decorate things already adorable… Men did not love Rome because she was great. She was great because they had loved her.

Love is not blind; that is the last thing that it is. Love is bound; and the more it is bound, the less it is blind.

An imbecile habit has arisen in modern controversy of saying that such and such a creed can be held in one age but cannot be held in another. Some dogma, we are told, was credible in the twelfth century, but is not credible in the twentieth. You might as well say that a certain philosophy can be believed on Mondays, but cannot be believed on Tuesdays.


Chapter 7:

A strict rule is not only necessary for ruling; it is also necessary for rebelling. This fixed and familiar ideal is necessary to any sort of revolution.

As long as the vision of Heaven is always changing, the vision of earth will be exactly the same. No ideal will remain long enough to be realized, or even partly realized. The modern young man will never change his environment; for he will always change his mind.

What on earth is the current morality, except in its literal sense – the morality that is always running away?

The main point of Christianity was this: that Nature is not our mother: Nature is our sister. We can be proud of her beauty, since we have the same father; but she has no authority over us; we have to admire, but not to imitate.

Man must have just enough faith in himself to have adventures, and just enough doubt of himself to enjoy them.

I know that the most modern manufacture has been really occupied in trying to produce an abnormally large needle. I know that the most recent biologists have been chiefly anxious to discover a very small camel.
(A reference to Matthew 19:16-26)


Chapter 8:

Insisting that God is inside man, man is always inside himself. By insisting that God transcends man, man has transcended himself.

Men who begin to fight the Church for the sake of freedom and humanity end by flinging away freedom and humanity if only they may fight the Church.


Chapter 9:

Christianity is the only frame which has preserved the pleasure of Paganism. We might fancy some children playing on the flat grassy top of some tall island in the sea. So long as there was a wall round the cliff's edge they could fling themselves into every frantic game and make the place the noisiest of nurseries. But the walls were knocked down, leaving the naked peril of the precipice. They did not fall over; but when their friends returned to them they were all huddled in terror in the centre of the island; and their song had ceased.

Christianity is a super-human paradox whereby two opposite passions may blaze beside each other.

If anyone says that faith arose in ignorance and savagery, the answer is simple: it didn't. It arose in the Mediterranean civilization in the full summer of the Roman Empire.

How can we say that the Church wishes to bring us back into the Dark Ages? The Church was the only thing that ever brought us out of them.

A false ghost disproves the reality of ghosts exactly as much as a forged banknote disproves the existence of the Bank of England – if anything, it proves its existence.

This or that rite or doctrine may look as ugly and extraordinary as a rake; but I have found by experience that such things end somehow in grass and flowers. A clergyman may be apparently as useless as a cat, but he is also as fascinating, for there must be some strange reason for his existence.

This, therefore, is, in conclusion, my reason for accepting the religion, and not merely the scattered and secular truths out of the religion. I do it because the thing has not merely told this truth or that truth, but has revealed itself as a truth-telling thing. All other philosophies say the things that plainly seem to be true: only this philosophy has again and again said the thing that does not seem to be true, but is true.

The outer ring of Christianity is a rigid guard of ethical abnegations and professional priests; but inside that inhuman guard you will find the old human life dancing like children, and drinking wine like men; for Christianity is the only frame for pagan freedom. But in the modern philosophy the case is opposite; it is its outer ring that is obviously artistic and emancipated; its despair is within. And its despair is this, that is does not really believe that there is any meaning in the universe; therefore it cannot hope to find any romance; its romances will have no plots.

Melancholy should be an innocent interlude, a tender and fugitive frame of mind; praise should be the permanent pulsation of the soul.

Joy, which was the small publicity of the pagan, is the gigantic secret of the Christian.

There was some one thing that was too great for God to show us when he walked upon our earth; and I have sometimes fancied that it was his mirth.
(The last sentence in the book, making for a mysterious and dramatic ending)

Saturday, July 28, 2012

Olympic Opening Ceremonies - Ten Thoughts


1.   I liked the simple start to the ceremonies – a child singing Jerusalem, one of Britian's beautiful traditional hymns. (Above is a more dramatic rendition of the song, conducted by Mark Elder with the BBC Symphony Orchestra, BBC Singers, and BBC Symphony Chorus)



2.   The flying Olympic rings were really cool, first glowing like molten medal, then exploding and showering down sparks.



3.   James Bond was just the man to safely take the Queen from Buckingham Palace to the stadium!  hahaha



4. Apparently there is a second verse to God Save the Queen... I'd never heard it before.



5.   I also didn't know that Mr. Bean was such a talented musician! Mr. Atkinson's performance was definitely one of my favourite parts of the ceremony :)



6.   The tiny country of Luxembourg is usually not too noticable at the Olympics. However, surely I couldn't have been the only one to notice how good looking their flag bearer is this year? Her name is Marie Muller, and she is competing in the sport of Judo.



7.   Poland's flag is white with a red stripe on the bottom, Monaco's flag is white with a red stripe on the top, and Indonesia's flag... well, no one's explained to me yet how Indonesia's flag is any different from Monaco's. Makes me kind of glad that Canada has that unique maple leaf in the middle.



8.   The International Olympic Committee refused to acknowledge the 40th anniversary of the massacre at the Munich Olympics, despite pressure from many world leaders (including John Baird, Hillary Clinton, and even Obama). I find that completely disgraceful.



9.   The cauldron was very beautiful! I loved how they let six young athletes nominated by outstanding Olympians to light the cauldron. Equally cool was how the individual copper petals were lit before folding up into one giant flame. I see it as symbolic of diversity and unity, as each country brought in one of the petals during the Parade of Nations.



10.   Paul McCartney performed very well, and I loved his enthusiasm! I still have that song stuck in my head. Naaa na na na na na naaaaa, na na na naaaaa hey Jude!



***
Photo Credits:

1. http://www.morethanthegames.co.uk/london-2012/2717930-olympics-london-2012-opening-ceremony-charts-british-history
2. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/olympics/article-2180064/London-2012-Olympic-Opening-Ceremony--pictures-action.html
5. http://www.ottawacitizen.com/sports/Games+rituals+wasn/7003414/story.html
6. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2180052/Mr-Bean-Olympic-Opening-Rowan-Atkinson-brings-house-leads-orchestra-hilarious-rendition.html
7. http://www.mariemuller.info/Marie_Muller/Fotos/Seiten/Fotoshooting.html
8. http://twistedsifter.sifter.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/olympic-cauldron-opening-ceremony-london-2012-cover-800x500.jpg
10. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-19024254
11. http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-33747_162-57481790/2012-olympics-paul-mccartney-closes-londons-opening-ceremony/

Monday, July 2, 2012

Survival

You have been selected to participate in a popular TV gameshow called... the Hunger Games. You are one of 24 contestants, and only one of you can come out alive. In order to survive, you will have to kill at least one other person (probably more). Would you participate, knowing that you will need to kill others in order to live? Or would you kill yourself before the Games started?

I originally thought that all the killings inside the Hunger Games arena would be in self-defence. However, is it really self-defence if you are going into the arena knowing that you will have to kill people? Isn't that actually closer to premeditated murder?


 Spoiler Alert! 

In The Hunger Games, the hero and heroine (Katniss and Peeta) decide to kill to survive. However, by the end of the story, when they are the last two standing, they can't bring themselves to kill the other. So they decide to attempt suicide together.

The Hunger Games portrays many instances of Katniss and Peeta putting themselves at risk to help others, which is admirable. However, their selfless acts are (for the most part) limited for those they know and love – on the other hand, they are willing to kill people they don't know in order to ensure their survival. This may be normal in our society, but seems contrary to the Bible's command to put others first (Philippians 2:3-11 and 1 Corinthians 10:24).

The question remains... What would you do?

Saturday, May 5, 2012

Motion 312


       Member of Parliament Stephen Woodworth recently introduced Motion 312 to the Canadian House of Commons, calling for a Parliamentary committee to "review the declaration in Subsection 223(1) of the Criminal Code of Canada which states that a child becomes a human being only at the moment of complete birth." On April 26th the motion came up for debate, and unfortunately many Members of Parliament argued vigorously against it (click here to watch the beginning of the debate).

       I believe that this motion is of the utmost importance. We must ensure that all human beings in Canada receive human rights protections, and this can only happen if every human being in Canada is considered such under our law! I couldn't agree more with Stephen Woodworth when he recently tweeted, "I'm pretty sure a child is as much a human being 5 minutes before birth as 5 minutes after birth." Yet Canadian law still states that a child is not a human being until it is born, and it is completely legal to kill a child at any time before birth!

       Many Canadians think that humanity begins before birth, and this view seems to be supported by current scientific evidence (for example, unborn children have their own, unique DNA and their own, separate circulation systems). It is Parliament's duty to examine this important issue and reach a scientifically and morally valid conclusion! All Motion 312 calls for is a Parliamentary committee to address this urgent matter. If Canada's law regarding the beginning of humanity is correct, it will hold up to scrutiny. If it is incorrect, then it is Parliament's duty to change it.


Abortion in Canada:

➜ Abortion is legal at any stage in pregnancy, right up to the moment before birth

➜ It is legal to get an abortion for any reason

➜ Almost every abortion in Canada is payed for by taxpayers

➜ Teenagers do not need parental consent to have an abortion (they do not even have to inform their parents)

➜ Many Canadians do not know that Canada has no laws restricting abortion

➤ Source: Abortion Statistics Show Reality of a Land Without Restrictions – National Post


       In the first hour of debate over Motion 312 in Parliament, Stephen Woodworth stated, "If you care about the truth, you will courageously follow the facts wherever they lead. Canadians expect Parliamentarians to embody that courage, that strength, that principled quest for the truth." It is time for the Canadian government to stop stifling debate and take a look at this issue. Please contact your Member of Parliament and ask him or to stand up for the truth by supporting Motion 312!

Wednesday, April 25, 2012

Alberta Election 2012: Summary

Alison Redford, Alberta's first elected female Premier!
Danielle Smith, Alberta's new opposition leader!

       On Monday Albertans made their final decisions on who to vote for, and the Progressive Conservatives came out on top, winning the party's 12th majority government in a row! In case you haven't already heard the results, the PCs won 61 seats, the Wildrose 17, the Liberals 5, and the NDP 4.

       Wildrose supporters are naturally disappointed that their party did not get elected into government, and many are angry at the results. I saw some fairly undignified comments on facebook last night (the funniest and most ridiculous one being "ugh redford isn't fit to run a hotdog stand"). Thankfully, Wildrose leader Danielle Smith remained very positive in her post-election speech. As a Wildrose supporter, I too am taking a positive view of this election – it is too bad that the PCs were not ousted from government, but I consider this election a victory for the Wildrose nonetheless. The party will get a chance to gain some experience and the trust of Albertans before (hopefully) coming into office in the next election (in 2016).

       I am no fan of the Progressive Conservative party; however, Premier Redford is an experienced and relatively competent leader. Because of this, I am proud to have her as my province's first elected female premier (by the way, the CBC has a good profiles on all the party leaders in their Alberta Votes 2012 feature). Many of the PC's votes were probably from Liberal and NDP supporters who decided to vote for the PC party in order to keep the Wildrose party out of power. Despite this "strategic voting", four former cabinet ministers lost their seats in the election, showing that although the party was elected, there are a large number of Albertans who are discontent with the PCs.

       The Alberta Liberal Party declined in popularity this election, winning five seats (down from 8 before the election). The party's leader, Raj Sherman, was elected as a Progressive Conservative in 2008 but was soon kicked out of caucus for publicly criticizing the PC's health care policy. Fortunately for Mr. Sherman, many of his constituents decided to vote for him again, and he was re-elected (although only by 118 votes).

       The Alberta New Democratic Party (NDP) ran a successful campaign and were rewarded with four seats (up from a mere two seats before the election). Their leader Brian Mason was among those elected. From his performance at the leaders debate, Mr. Mason seems like a strong leader and I believe he will be a good voice to have in the Legislature.

       The new Alberta Party (yes, they don't have the most original name) failed to get a seat in the Legislature, but their leader Glenn Taylor is trying to stay positive, telling the press, "I feel we accomplished what we set out to. Our goal was to introduce ourselves to Albertans, and from that perspective, it was a smashing success."

       Voter turnout was a marginally successful 57%, up from the measly 41% of voters who bothered to cast a ballot in the last election.
       I was happy to hear that some of my favourite MLAs were re-elected, specifically Rob Anderson (a Wildrose MLA who gained my support after standing up for diversity in education choices in a recent Education Act debate) and Doug Griffiths (my favourite candidate in the PC leadership election last year).

       This election is a step in the right direction, but not as big a step as many Albertans had hoped for. I will conclude with a quote from Danielle Smith, regarding the election results: “Am I surprised? Yeah. Am I disappointed? Yeah. Am I discouraged? Not a chance.”

Saturday, April 7, 2012

Alberta Election 2012


Alberta is going to the polls on Monday, April 23, and there are five major parties contending for seats in the Legislature:

The Progressive Conservatives have been in power since 1971, winning majority governments in the last 11 provincial elections! The leader of the PC Party (and our current Premier) is Alison Redford, who was elected by the party in October of last year.

The Liberal Party is the official opposition, holding 8 seats going into this election. Albertans in general are famous for their vehement anti-Liberal sentiments, and the Alberta Liberals have not been in power since 1921! The leader of this unfortunate party is Raj Sherman.

The Wildrose Party hasn't been around for long (its origins go back to 2007), but it has already gained lots of support from Albertans fed up with the PC Party's long reign. According to a recent poll the Wildrose is likely to win a majority government in the upcoming election! Their leader is Danielle Smith.

The New Democratic Party (NDP) has 2 seats in the Legislature and is hoping to gain more this election. On their website they say, "We believe that it’s time that Alberta’s prosperity, drawn from our shared natural resource wealth, worked for all Albertans, not just a select few." Their leader is Brian Mason.

The Alberta Party describes themselves on their website as "a new political movement dedicated to transforming government through citizen engagement." According to polls, they are unlikely to get a seat in the upcoming election. Their leader is Glenn Taylor.


***

Note: When I wrote this post, I decided to endorse the Wildrose Party for the reasons listed below. However, I have since resolved to no longer endorse any political party on this blog.

1. They've pledged to take numerous steps to increase democracy and accountability in provincial politics.
2. They acknowledge that there are good alternatives to public schools (e.g. Catholic schools, private schools, and homeschooling) and have decided "to foster a culture of educational choice, innovation and competition."
3. The party has decided to support "private health care for certain procedures as a way to alleviate long waiting times" (as reported by the Globe and Mail). They also say they will remain dedicated to "fixing" the the public health care system.
4. They want to balance the budget. I quote from their website: "Albertans work hard, pay their taxes, and live within their means – and they expect their government to do the same." I just hope they don't make too many cuts (and I'm not convinced that their idea to send cheques back to Albertans in surplus years is a good idea).
5. They support "conscious rights", which allows "public servants to opt-out of providing services they consider morally objectionable. This could allow a marriage counsellor to refuse to wed same-sex couples or a doctor to refuse to prescribe birth-control" (as reported by the National Post).
6. The Wildrose Party is the only party with enough support to dethrone the PC Party, which has dominated provincial politics for over 40 years.

Monday, March 5, 2012

LRA Violence and Joseph Kony


Did you know that over 30,000 children have been abducted by Joseph Kony, the leader of the "Lord's Resistance Army" in Africa?

These children are being brainwashed and forced to become soldiers or sex slaves. Kony has been on the run for years, as he is considered one of the world's worst war criminals. Now is the time to arrest him and put an end to this wickedness.





Please spread the word!

Tuesday, February 14, 2012

LOVE

– 1 John 4:8

“‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.’ This is the first and greatest commandment. And the second is like it: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’ All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments.” – Matthew 22:36-40  (Jesus speaking)

“A new command I give you: Love one another. As I have loved you, so you must love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another.” – John 13:34-35  (Jesus speaking)


     As these Bible verses show, following Jesus is all about love. But hold on a second... what is love? Is it just a fuzzy feeling we get when we're around the person we like? Let's find out what the Bible says...


First, take a look at 1 Corinthians 13, well known as "The Love Chapter." Here is a lot of information about what love is. Right off the bat, the first three verses tell us that love is extremely important, and without love, everything we do is meaningless. Then the next couple verses say:

1. Love is patient.
2. Love is kind.
3. Love does not envy.
4. Love does not boast.
5. Love is not proud.
6. Love does not dishonor others.
7. Love is not self-seeking.
8. Love is not easily angered.
9. Love keeps no record of wrongs.
10. Love does not delight in evil but rejoices with the truth.
11. Love always protects.
12. Love always trusts.
13. Love always hopes.
14. Love always perseveres.

     Wow, that's quite the list, eh? But there's a pattern here – I think it's clear that love is about putting others first.


Second, visit John 13:1-17. In this passage, Jesus washes His disciples' feet because of His deep love for them. Here Jesus demonstrates true, perfect love. Jesus was God! Yet He humbled himself, taking the job of the lowest servant. And He told us to do the same. In this passage, Jesus showed us that the opposite of love is selfishness. Without humbling ourselves and putting others first, we can't love properly. Love is about action, not mere feelings or rhetoric (1 John 3:18). Without acting out our love to the people around us, what's the point?


Third, read Galatians 5:19-23. Here we learn that true, pure love needs to follow God's plan. Otherwise, it's just a cheap imitation. Stuff like sexual immorality, jealousy and quarrelling have nothing to do with love. You can see a lot of this in the world today: instead of true, pure love, we find stuff that corrupts and perverts love, or simply goes against it altogether.
     For example, some people think they can have sex with as many people as they want, or with people of the same gender, or with young children. Others think it's okay to kill their unborn baby if he or she poses an inconvenience to them. Many people don't see any problem with treating someone as a mere sexual object, by lusting after friends and viewing pornography. In short, we find selfishness and hedonism – the complete opposites of love.
     I'm still trying to untangle the love and lust in my life. I'm still trying to fully understand what love means. I hope you'll join me in this quest for a deeper understanding of pure, true love. But in the meantime...

Follow God. Love. Change the world.


Monday, February 13, 2012

Where is the Love?


People killin', people dyin'
Children hurt and you hear them cryin'
Can you practice what you preach?
And would you turn the other cheek?

Father, Father, Father help us
Send some guidance from above
'Cause people got me, got me questionin'
Where is the love?


     Hate abounds everywhere. War rages across the globe, pitting man against man in a whirlwind of death and destruction. Racism beats down people just because they're "different". Children are abused by adults and bullied by their peers. Half of marriages in the US and Canada now end in divorce.
     In short, the world needs more of this thing we call love. Every single person I know would agree with that. But where can we find it? Visit my blog tomorrow to find out!

Tuesday, February 7, 2012

New Toblerone Commercial!


A great commercial for Toblerone that I thought I'd share :)


This is not my video and I am not endorsed by Toblerone.

Saturday, January 14, 2012

The Worst (Preventable) Things Going on in the World Right NOW



War

Mexico's drug war: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-16337488

Pakistan-India Kashmir war: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/10537286 and http://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/pk.html

LRA conflict in Uganda:
http://www.invisiblechildren.com/history-of-the-war

etc.

Child soldiers
http://www.un.org/children/conflict/english/issues.html

Child abuse
http://www.zebracentre.ca/facing-the-facts/

Extreme poverty and malnutrition 
http://www.wfp.org/hunger/stats

Often reinforced by racism – http://www.gfa.org/dalit/about-the-dalits/

Abortion
http://www.campaignlifecoalition.com/index.php?p=Abortion
(a genocide of the unborn)

*****

         This short list is just a start... How can we just sit back and go on with our everyday lives, knowing that every day people are going through terrible things like these and dying unecessarly, when we could help them? I know I can't just sit back... because God has broken my heart for the broken in this world. I used to have lots of dreams and goals for my life – to get married to a beautiful girl, get a good writing job, become famous (most likely through my writing), buy a nice, cozy little house in some place like Hawaii, install a hot-tub, get a beagle... in short, to get a whole bunch of stuff for ME. It was all about ME, MYSELF, and I.
        Then just last year, God told me it isn't all about me. I am not the center of the universe. He told me to get rid of all my dreams and just surrender to Him. Of course, I didn't want to. But eventually God convinced me it was the best way to live my life to the fullest.
        So here I am... I know that some day I'll change the world. I hope that some day I'll be called to help people who are caught in the middle of war, to free child soldiers, to prevent child abuse and comfort its victims, to assist those who are starving in extreme poverty, to help end racism, and to put a stop to the genocide of the unborn.
        But for now, I'll just shine for Christ in my small 17-year-old life, help others when I can, and do my best to be a friend to those around me in the small town of Vegreville, Alberta.