Sunday, June 26, 2011

The Pros and Cons of our Canadian Political Parties (Post-Election)



   Conservatives   - Prime Minister Stephen Harper

Pros:
 - Harper is a good leader.
 - They have finally brought Canada a stable majority government, representing Canadians across the country.
 - During the 2011 election, the Conservatives showed that they were proud to be Canadian.
 - I really like their promise to forgive a portion of student loans for doctors and nurses in under-served rural communities.
 - They have brought our country out of a recession and strengthened the Canadian dollar (It's hard to do both).
 - They have withdrawn from our combat role in Afghanistan and emphasized the defence of our own country instead.

Cons:
 - They want to get rid of the per-vote party subsidy, which helps gives individual votes more impact.
 - They want to abolish the useful long gun registry, which keeps gun owners accountable for their weapons. (For more information, see my post The Long Gun Registry)
 - Update: I am worried by the extensive spending cuts introduced in the 2012 federal budget, which will inevitably result in less effective government services. Less government is not always better!



   New Democratic Party (NDP)   - Thomas Mulcair

Pros:
 - During the 2011 election, they made a special effort to show they were proud to be Canadian.
 - They want to keep the long gun registry and per-vote subsidies.

Cons:
 - With over half of their MPs now from Quebec, they are stuck having to serve that province's interests. 
 - They are anti-oilsands, even though the oilsands are a very important part of Canada's economy.
 - They support the flawed "Proportional Representation" electoral reform.
 - They would increase funding for abortion. The party also vigorously opposes any debate related to the criminalization of abortion.



   Liberals   - Bob Rae (interim leader)

Pros: 
 - They also promised loan forgiveness and benefits for doctors and nurses going to rural communities.
 - The party wants to keep the long gun registry and per-vote subsidies.
 - Update: They recently decided to endorse the legalization of marijuana (probably in an attempt to regain support from young Canadians). Of course, this move could be a "pro" or "con" depending on your view of marijuana.

Cons:
 - Their leadership problem is very serious. The party has been plagued with unpopular leadership lately, and it appears that they still are unable to find a good leader. They need someone who can re-establish the identity of the party and inspire people to support them after Canada rejected them in the 2011 election.



   Bloc Québécois   - Daniel Paillé

Pros: Um... I can't think of any.

Cons:
 - They are anti-Canadian and want Quebec to separate.
 - They only run in the province of Quebec and only support that province's interests.
 - They seem to be against multiculturalism.
 - The Bloc was decimated in the 2011 election and lost their strong leader Duceppe. Their future looks bleak.



   Green Party   - Elizabeth May

Pros:
 - Elizabeth May claims she wants to make Canadian politics less partisan and more respectful.
 - The party wants to legalise marijuana (again, this could be a good or bad thing depending on whether or not you think the drug should be legal).

Cons:
 - They are strongly anti-oilsands.
 - They want a carbon tax, which is highly impractical. 
 - They promote global warming alarmism. I quote from their website:

"It is estimated that climate change now claims the lives of over 315,000 people annually and is expected to create 700 million environmental refugees by mid-century."

"It’s important that we all pitch in to avert a climate catastrophe."

(Note: The average global temperature has changed less than one degree in the last hundred years. The estimates quoted are mere speculation on what would happen if the temperature changed dramatically, which is why I call it alarmism.)

Monday, June 20, 2011

Ancient Words


    The Bible is comprised of 66 books written thousands of years ago, in three different languages (Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek). Christians (like me!) believe it is God's word - essentially God talking to us! Unfortunately, many people think the Bible isn't relevant today, in our modern world. But just because something is old, it doesn't mean it's irrelevant. We don't abandon seniors just because they're past their prime. Classic books written hundreds or even thousands of years ago are still read for the wisdom written inside that transcends time. The thoughts of ancient writers like Plato and Socrates are still very relevant and influential.

    But what does the Bible have to say about its own relevancy? Since it is the foundation for my life, the backbone of my worldview (set of beliefs), and the air I breathe, I can't help but ask this question. I like the let the Bible speak for itself, so let's take a look...

*  "The grass withers and the flowers fall, but the word of our God stands forever." - Isaiah 40:8

*  "Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will never pass away." - Matthew 24:35 (Jesus speaking)

 "Jesus Christ is the same yesterday and today and forever." - Hebrews 13:8

    I think the answer is pretty clear. But even if it still is relevant, why should we place our faith in it? What's so special about the Bible?

*  "And the words of the LORD are flawless, like silver refined in a furnace of clay, purified seven times." - Psalm 12:6

*  "Sanctify them by the truth; your word is truth." - John 17:17 (Jesus speaking)

*  "May my tongue sing of your word, for all your commands are righteous." - Psalm 119:172

*  "For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, declares the LORD. As the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways and my thoughts than your thoughts." - Isaiah 55:8-9

    The Bible is pure, true and righteous. It reveals God to us - His greatness, His justice and love, His plan for all of humanity, and His plan for you. He is better and greater than anything we could imagine.
    The Bible has also been accurately preserved and passed down to us. For example, The Case for Christ, a great book written by former-atheist (now Christian) journalist Lee Strobel, points out that "the modern New Testament is 99.5 percent free of textual discrepancies, with no major Christian doctrines in doubt." We have eye-witness accounts of Jesus' life and death, with far better reliability than most ancient documents. It was those accounts which led Strobel to a faith in Jesus Christ.

All Bible verses are from the NIV, copyright 1984.